LinkedIn InMail vs Connection Request: Which one gets more replies?

InMails vs Invites: Which wins? Stop wasting credits. Learn the 3-step escalation strategy to boost response rates and save budget today.
Last update
Feb 4, 2026
LinkedIn InMail vs Connection Request: Which one gets more replies?
Eliott Pleeck
LinkedIn InMail vs Connection Request: Which one gets more replies?
Start recruiting faster today
Discover Leonar
Content

You’ve just scouted the perfect candidate on LinkedIn. The profile is a match, the timing seems right. Now comes the tactical move: how do you break the ice? Should you burn a precious InMail credit to guarantee visibility? Send a "blank" invitation to spark curiosity? Or bet on an ultra-personalized note to show you’ve done your homework?

As recruitment experts, we see too many teams stuck in one method out of habit. However, peak performance lies in psychology and resource management. Here is the verdict of the triple match.

1. InMails vs. Connection Requests: What is the difference?

Before diving into the analysis, let's clarify the technical ground. When you are trying to reach someone new on LinkedIn, you are essentially choosing between a digital handshake and a priority letter. While both aim to start a conversation, they function quite differently regarding access and etiquette.

The Connection Request is the standard, free method available to every user. It is an invitation to join someone’s professional network. If they accept, you become "1st-degree connections," allowing you to message freely and see full profile details. However, this method comes with strict limitations. You must wait for the recipient to accept your request before you can send a full message, and your initial introductory note is capped at 300 characters. You can also leave it blank.

The InMail, by contrast, is a premium feature available only to subscribers of LinkedIn Premium, Sales Navigator, or Recruiter. Think of this as a direct line that bypasses the gatekeeper. An InMail allows you to message someone you are not connected with, landing directly in their inbox without needing a prior acceptance. You can include dedicated subject line and up to 2,000 characters in the body.

👉 Related Reading: Detailed comparison of LinkedIn Premium accounts for recruiting.

2. Why Recruiters Default to InMails (The LinkedIn Trap)

LinkedIn heavily encourages the use of InMails. From the platform's perspective, this makes perfect sense, and they have built features that make the InMail the path of least resistance for hiring teams.

  • The "Inbox Certainty": You are guaranteed to land in the candidate's main inbox without waiting for an approval. When a recruiter sends an InMail, they are essentially purchasing the guarantee that their message will land directly in the candidate's main inbox without the friction of a gatekeeper.
  • Unlimited Characters: Unlike connection notes, InMails allow for long-form pitches, attachments, and structured job offers.
  • Platform Nudging: LinkedIn Recruiter is designed to make sending an InMail the "path of least resistance."

3. The 5 Major Limitations of InMails

While they seem like a "silver bullet," InMails have significant drawbacks that can hurt your ROI:

  • Strict Limits: You only get a fixed number of credits based on your plan. Once they are gone, you are have to wait until they recharge, or buy extra inmails.
  • High Cost: At ~$2 per credit, a failed campaign is expensive (more information on our blog post: Linkedin Inmail credits cost)
  • Lower Response Rates: Data shows that InMails often feel like "sponsored ads." Connection requests, being more personal, consistently yield higher engagement.
  • No Network Growth: An InMail is a one-off transaction. If the candidate doesn't reply, they aren't in your network. You don't build a long-term asset.
  • Single Follow-up: You can usually only send one follow-up message if the InMail goes unanswered, limiting your "nurturing" capabilities.

4. The Dashboard: Statistics and Psychology

Channel Cost / Limit Effort / Time Final Response Rate Psychological Effect
InMail (Paid) ~$2 / unit Low 15% - 25% Transactional ("Selling a job")
Blank Invitation Free Minimal 5% - 15% Curiosity ("Who is this?")
Invitation + Note Free High (Time-consuming) 35% - 45% Recognition ("They know me")

💡 Expert Tip: "Pattern Interrupt" is your best ally. In 2026, top-tier candidates are bombarded with InMails. A text-free invitation creates mystery, often opening a door that a paid pitch would have kept shut.

5. Strategic Analysis: Comparing Your Options

Approach 1: The InMail (The Last Resort Artillery)

Use it for "out-of-network" profiles you need to reach urgently. But remember: it's a "one-shot" weapon. If they don't reply, the credit is gone, and the relationship hasn't even started. It's an expensive way to fail if your targeting isn't 100% accurate.

👉 Looking to automate inmails? Check our blog post: How to automate Linkedin Inmails.

Approach 2: The Blank Invitation (The Curiosity Bet)

The preferred strategy for sharp headhunters who value network growth. It requires zero effort from the candidate to "Accept." Once they are in, you have direct, free access to them forever.

The Hack: Tools like Leonar detect the acceptance in real-time, allowing you to trigger a message the moment the candidate is still active on the app, maximizing the "curiosity" window.

👉 Looking to automate connection requests ? Check our blog post: How to automate Linkedin Connection Requests.

Approach 3: The Personalized Note (The Relationship Bet)

Essential for C-Level profiles and high-stakes roles.

The Trap: It is extremely time-consuming. Real personalization takes 5-10 minutes per profile, which kills your sourcing volume.

The Solution: Platforms like Leonar automate this by using AI to analyze the profile and write a unique hook in 2 seconds, giving you the best of both worlds: quality and scale.

👉 Looking for ideas for your message? Check our 5 perfect connection request messages.

6. The Escalation Strategy: Only pay if the free tools fail

The best recruiters view InMails as a last resort, not a first step. An effective escalation strategy begins with a "Curiosity" phase, where you send a blank connection request. This approach is free, incredibly fast to execute, and relies on the candidate viewing your profile out of intrigue rather than reacting to a pitch.

Here are the three steps.

Phase 1 • Wide Net

Blank Connection Request

Cost: $0 | Time: Instant
Phase 2 • The Pivot (Day 3)

Withdraw & Email

For those who didn't accept
Phase 3 • Last Resort

InMail

Only for the silent 5%
  • Phase 1 (Curiosity): Send a blank invitation. Fast and free.
  • Phase 2 (Pivot): If not accepted after 3 days, withdraw and send an Email.
  • Phase 3 (Final): Use InMail only for the 5% who remain silent to all other channels.

7. Why automate with Leonar?

Managing this multi-layered strategy manually is a nightmare. Leonar acts as your orchestrator:

  • Smart Workflows: Program sequences (Blank Invite → Automated Follow-up → Email → Final InMail).
  • Save Budget: Cut LinkedIn costs by 4 by using free channels first.
  • Build an Asset: Grow your network and centralize every reply (LinkedIn, Email, WhatsApp) in one unified inbox.

Thank you for your feedback !

Summartize this article with:

About the author
Eliott Pleeck
Eliott Pleeck
Linkedin page
How useful was this post?
Click to rate it
Average rating 5 / 5. Votes count:
23
Start recruiting faster today

Leonar is trusted by recruiters from startups, staffing agencies, and global companies. It’s the fast, modern way to recruit top talent.

Schedule a demo
Talent Pipeline

Our other posts

Top 6 best Waalaxy alternatives for recruiters
Top 6 best Waalaxy alternatives for recruiters

Waalaxy is for sales. It lacks ATS sync. Discover 6 alternatives and see why Leonar is the only automation tool designed specifically for recruiters.

7 Best Talent Sourcing Platforms to Find Top Candidates
7 Best Talent Sourcing Platforms to Find Top Candidates

Discover the 7 best talent sourcing platforms of 2026. Compare tools like Leonar, LinkedIn & HireEZ to find the best AI software for your hiring.

Top 5 Juicebox alternatives for sourcing candidates
Top 5 Juicebox alternatives for sourcing candidates

Looking for Juicebox alternatives? We review PeopleGPT's limits and compare top AI recruiting tools like Leonar, HireEZ, Pin, and Seekout.